Signals · 4
A big-tent or small-tent AI safety movement? — The unstated disagreement that underpins safety debates
Arvind Narayanan suggests that AI safety debates are driven by an unstated disagreement over whether the movement should be big-tent or small-tent.
AI existential risk probabilities are (still) too unreliable to inform policy — How speculation gets laundered through pseudo-quantification
Arvind Narayanan argues that AI existential risk probabilities are too unreliable to inform policy due to speculative pseudo-quantification.
The AI-as-Normal-Technology view of loss-of-control incidents — A middle ground between the cybersecurity and AI safety communities
The post discusses viewing AI loss-of-control incidents as normal technology to bridge cybersecurity and AI safety perspectives.
AI agents can't yet do open-ended AI research — Early evidence from two case studies